Title: | An American Look at Zappers |
Authors: | Ainsworth, Richard T., Boston University School of Law, Bosten, MA, USA |
Contributors: | HostingInstitution: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), ISNI: 0000 0001 2186 1887 |
Pages: | 7 |
Language: | en |
DOI: | 10.7795/210.20130206P |
Resource Type: | Text / Article |
Publisher: | Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) |
Relationships: | IsVariantFormOf: ISBN 978-3-95606-001-4 IsPartOf: ISSN 0942-1785 |
Dates: |
Available: 2013 Issued: 2013-03 |
File: |
Download File
(application/pdf)
172.42 kB (176554 Bytes)
MD5 Checksum: 01d1cbdbb8842afbfc824bbd9001d413 SHA256 Checksum: a4c9c05a8db6697fdf01dbcc9a10ff8b206dba088eddde8fba6c4aee8e2e52af |
Keywords: | VAT ; ECR ; POS ; cash register ; zapper ; software ; audit ; U.S. ; sales suppression ; tax loss ; INSIKA ; smart card ; MEV ; SRM ; SDC-Mob ; Fedict ; Belastingdienst ; Germany ; Quebec ; Belgium ; Netherlands ; Norway ; Sweden |
Abstract: | The U.S. lags behind most other countries in the pursuit of zapper software. Sales suppression catches the attention of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) only if the manipulation seriously impacts a taxpayer’s annual income. This is only to be expected. The federal government secures revenue primarily through an annual income tax. The U.S. has no broad-based transaction tax, or federal VAT. |
Remark: | This paper is part of the report: Zisky, Norbert (ed.) ; Wolff, Jörg (ed.): Revisionssicheres System zur Aufzeichnung von Kassenvorgängen und Messinformationen. INSIKA ? Konzept, Umsetzung und Erprobung (= PTB-Bericht PTB-IT-18, doi: 10.7795/210.20130206a) http://dx.doi.org/10.7795/210.20130206a. |